teraz to zalezy jeszcze od styluBOCZEK pisze:w odpowiedzi pełny edytor i wklejasz zdjęcie....ale najpierw musisz zrobić zdjęcie (p. print scrin) wykresu i obrobić je np w paincie, sam używam narzedzie wycinania które jest w stanadradzie w Windows 7
utyk pisze:marekdt
EURUSD - wyciągnęli cenę powyżej 1.275 jeśli utrzymają to up
???
Gdyby takie ryzyko by wystąpiło... do czego mogą uciec inwestorzy ? Poza tym, że w pierwszym etapie spadających cen akcji - mogliby uciec do bezpiecznych aktywów np. obligacji i ? Później ?These are the personal views of Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business and former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission:
The Commerce Department reported the deficit on international trade in goods and services was $41.5 billion in September, up from $24.9 billion prior to the economic recovery.
Imported oil and subsidized imports from China account for nearly all of the $500 billion annual trade gap. Dollars spent abroad that do not return to buy U.S. exports reduce demand for U.S. goods and services, and slack demand is the principal reason for slow growth and jobs creation in the U.S.
In 2009, stimulus spending and additional tax cuts increased domestic spending by $1 trillion and jump-started growth, but those tripled the federal deficit.
In 2010, consumer spending accelerated--deleveraging, as measured by new consumer credit ended--and the recovery had its best year--gross domestic product grew 2.4%.
However, too many stimulus and consumer dollars went abroad to purchase more oil and other imports, principally from China, and too many stimulus dollars were squandered on dead-end projects like failed solar panel manufacturer Solyndra or electric vehicle technologies that failed. Those kept the initial recovery from accelerating hiring and boosting wages, and in turn, from becoming self-sustaining.
Ultimately, the recovery remained dependent on huge federal deficits, which have averaged $1.3 trillion over the last four years--three times the last Bush Administration deficit in 2008.
The economic recovery began five months after Barack Obama took office, and GDP growth has averaged 2.2%. In October 2009, unemployment peaked at 10%, and has since fallen to 7.9%; however, a lower percentage of adults working or seeking work accounts for about 80% of that reduction.
Ronald Reagan inherited a similarly troubled economy with unemployment cresting at 10.8% early in his presidency. When he sought re-election, the economy was growing at 6.3%, unemployment was 7.3% with adult labor force participation rising.
Mr. Reagan encouraged the development of natural resources and endured much criticism from environmentalists and academics. Whereas Mr. Obama has talked repeatedly about developing alternative energy resources and imposed limits on oil production in the Gulf, off the Pacific and Atlantic Coasts, and Alaska. Merely replacing domestic oil with imports does little to improve air quality or curb CO2 emissions.
To boost sales of Chinese products in the U.S., Beijing undervalues the yuan through intervention in currency markets and subsidizes exports. It pirates U.S. technology and imposes high tariffs on imports. Diplomatic efforts pursued by both President George W. Bush and President Obama have failed to yield much relief for competing U.S. businesses and workers.
Eliminating the trade deficit by developing U.S. energy and taking aggressive steps to counter Chinese protectionism would boost GDP by $1 trillion and create 10 million jobs.
However, in coming months the president and Congress will be preoccupied with averting the "fiscal cliff" and deficit reduction--without action by Jan. 1, taxes will increase by $136 billion and spending will be cut by $532 billion.
The likely outcome is higher taxes on the wealthy and spending reductions that will slice the deficit by about $300 billion. This reduction in demand could throw the economy into a deep recession without offsetting policy actions to jump-start additional oil and gas production, curb the growing trade deficit with China or offer businesses relief from new regulations and health-care mandates.
Other items on President Obama's second-term agenda--tax reform, immigration reform and alternative energy project--will take many months to affect and have few immediate effects on growth.
In the end, the president and Congress will not be able to raise taxes--be those on the wealthiest of the wealthy or anyone else--and cut spending without risking a second recession, deeper and more painful than the Great Recession.
marekdt pisze:O fiscal Cliff i możliwej drugiej recesji.
Prof. Peter Morici.
Gdyby takie ryzyko by wystąpiło... do czego mogą uciec inwestorzy ? Poza tym, że w pierwszym etapie spadających cen akcji - mogliby uciec do bezpiecznych aktywów np. obligacji i ? Później ?These are the personal views of Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business and former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission:
The Commerce Department reported the deficit on international trade in goods and services was $41.5 billion in September, up from $24.9 billion prior to the economic recovery.
Imported oil and subsidized imports from China account for nearly all of the $500 billion annual trade gap. Dollars spent abroad that do not return to buy U.S. exports reduce demand for U.S. goods and services, and slack demand is the principal reason for slow growth and jobs creation in the U.S.
In 2009, stimulus spending and additional tax cuts increased domestic spending by $1 trillion and jump-started growth, but those tripled the federal deficit.
In 2010, consumer spending accelerated--deleveraging, as measured by new consumer credit ended--and the recovery had its best year--gross domestic product grew 2.4%.
However, too many stimulus and consumer dollars went abroad to purchase more oil and other imports, principally from China, and too many stimulus dollars were squandered on dead-end projects like failed solar panel manufacturer Solyndra or electric vehicle technologies that failed. Those kept the initial recovery from accelerating hiring and boosting wages, and in turn, from becoming self-sustaining.
Ultimately, the recovery remained dependent on huge federal deficits, which have averaged $1.3 trillion over the last four years--three times the last Bush Administration deficit in 2008.
The economic recovery began five months after Barack Obama took office, and GDP growth has averaged 2.2%. In October 2009, unemployment peaked at 10%, and has since fallen to 7.9%; however, a lower percentage of adults working or seeking work accounts for about 80% of that reduction.
Ronald Reagan inherited a similarly troubled economy with unemployment cresting at 10.8% early in his presidency. When he sought re-election, the economy was growing at 6.3%, unemployment was 7.3% with adult labor force participation rising.
Mr. Reagan encouraged the development of natural resources and endured much criticism from environmentalists and academics. Whereas Mr. Obama has talked repeatedly about developing alternative energy resources and imposed limits on oil production in the Gulf, off the Pacific and Atlantic Coasts, and Alaska. Merely replacing domestic oil with imports does little to improve air quality or curb CO2 emissions.
To boost sales of Chinese products in the U.S., Beijing undervalues the yuan through intervention in currency markets and subsidizes exports. It pirates U.S. technology and imposes high tariffs on imports. Diplomatic efforts pursued by both President George W. Bush and President Obama have failed to yield much relief for competing U.S. businesses and workers.
Eliminating the trade deficit by developing U.S. energy and taking aggressive steps to counter Chinese protectionism would boost GDP by $1 trillion and create 10 million jobs.
However, in coming months the president and Congress will be preoccupied with averting the "fiscal cliff" and deficit reduction--without action by Jan. 1, taxes will increase by $136 billion and spending will be cut by $532 billion.
The likely outcome is higher taxes on the wealthy and spending reductions that will slice the deficit by about $300 billion. This reduction in demand could throw the economy into a deep recession without offsetting policy actions to jump-start additional oil and gas production, curb the growing trade deficit with China or offer businesses relief from new regulations and health-care mandates.
Other items on President Obama's second-term agenda--tax reform, immigration reform and alternative energy project--will take many months to affect and have few immediate effects on growth.
In the end, the president and Congress will not be able to raise taxes--be those on the wealthiest of the wealthy or anyone else--and cut spending without risking a second recession, deeper and more painful than the Great Recession.
